Captured on ASUS Zenfone Max Pro M1Īt the same time, the newer Snapdragon 632 comes with the Hexagon 546 DSP and a standard dual ISP. The 636 comes equipped with Qualcomm Hexagon 680 DSP (designed to support higher camera performance) and Qualcomm Spectra 160 ISP (for active depth mapping). The Snapdragon 636 houses a better and upgraded Image Signal Processor (ISP) and Digital Signal Processor (DSP). However, those are not the only differences between the two. The Snapdragon 632 can support a dual camera setup up to 13-megapixel and a 24-megapixel single camera on the front fascia. Propertyīoth the chipsets sport almost similar specs when it comes to the camera. And well, the numbers speak for themselves. We pitted two phones powered by the Snapdragon 632 and the Snapdragon 636 respectively, and following are the results in terms of benchmark scores. This difference would eventually come into play during serious high-res gaming. The Adreno 509 GPU is said to provide a 10% boost when compared to its predecessor, the Adreno 508 GPU. Instead of being clocked at 2.2 GHz, the Snapdragon 632 runs at 1.8 GHz clock speed. Though both chips use the same combination of Cortex A73 performance cores and Cortex A53 cores, they have different CPU clock frequency. On the other hand, the Snapdragon 632 bundles Kryo 250 processing cores. The combination of the performance cores and efficiency cores in the Kryo architecture is responsible for better performance, low latency, and improved task-sharing capabilities. The highlight of this processor is its 14nm process node and the Kryo 260 processing cores. The Snapdragon 636 is often considered the second highest performing SoC in the 600-series, right after the Snapdragon 660. Hardware Token, Qualcomm Processor Security, Application Security, Smart Camera Qualcomm Processor Security, Qualcomm Content Security Specifications That Matter Propertyĭual ISPs support up to 24 and 13+13 MP dual cameraĭual Qualcomm Spectra 160 ISP up to 24MP and 16MP So, now this brings us to an important question? What’s the difference between these Snapdragon 630 successors? MediaTek Helio P60 is the most innovative midrange SoC, but despite Geekbench showing almost the same results, Snapdragon 660 should remain the best in terms of performance.If you can recollect, the Snapdragon 636 made a debut as the successor to the Snapdragon 630. RELATED: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro With Snapdragon 636 and Oppo F7 With Helio P60 Have Similar Performance According To Benchmarks At last, MediaTek Helio P60 should be included in smartphones with a more affordable price than the one with Snapdragon 660. 7 DL), and the battery charging is faster thanks to the Quick Charge 4.0.īut the MediaTek Helio P60 has an advanced dedicated module for AI, which can perform deep-learning facial detection, scene recognition, AR and MR acceleration, and more smart tasks: it is called NeuroPilot. The Snapdragon 660 has a slightly better modem as well (Cat. So, the Snapdragon 660 may have better performance both in daily use and gaming. On the other hand, Snapdragon 660 has a higher clock frequency and an Adreno 512 GPU which I define better than the Mali G72 MP3 found on its opponent. This should make the new MediaTek SoC more power-efficient and provide a very low energy consumption. MediaTek Helio P60 has been built with a 12 nm production process, that is better than the 14 nm production process of the Snapdragon 660. GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Up to 8 GB, dual-channel LPDDR4X at 1800 MHz Max speed: 867 MbpsĬellular Modem: Snapdragon X12 LTE, up to 600 Mbps, upload speed up to 150 Mbps Up to 4K Ultra HD at 30 fps (video recording)Ĭellular Modem: LTE Cat.7 Download, Cat.13 2CA Upload So, let’s see which are the differences between MediaTek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, at least on the paper.Ĥx ARM Cortex A53, Clock frequency: up to 2 GHz – 2x Cortex A73, Clock frequency: up to 2 GHz – 12 nm, 64 bitĨx Kryo 260, Clock frequency: Up to 2.2 GHz, 14 nm, 64 bit But, you know, benchmarks are not everything order to evaluate the performance of a smartphone. Indeed, the first benchmarks have already shown similar results. To be accurate, considering that it is actually the best SoC by MediaTek launched in 2018, it will rival the Snapdragon 660, which is the best mid-end chipset by Qualcomm. It is a SoC which we will see in smartphones focused on the quality-price ratio, and this means that it will rival the Snapdragon 6xx series by Qualcomm. MediaTek unveiled its best midrange chipset ever at MWC 2018: the Helio P60.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |